šŸ“¢ Public Feedback Board and Roadmap

Can we see the tallies of what people find important, not important, critical etc? No need to see their feedback but if a lot of users are saying something is important/critical it might sway naysayers like me into trying the feature or keeping an eye on if and when said features are incorporated? Also a bit of a rough guide on time lines for things would be great.

5 Likes

Yes, I agree. Right now you only see a count of how many people have rated an item - no indication of what the spread of ratings were. It would surely also be helpful to see other’s comments, as this can stimulate ideas.

Lastly it would be good to have the link to the roadmap as prominent as possible to encourage as many people to participate as possible.

5 Likes

:waving_hand:

Thanks a lot for all the feedback, here and on the board :folded_hands:!

Some answers based on message here:

  • If you have issues (eg: with scrobblers) please share them with us via support. Bugs can be fixed and are not handled the same as Feature Requests.
  • Feature Requests are feature requests, we have a lot of them and can’t act on all of them.
  • I’ve seen some feedback about things that are not features per se. There has been many discussion about this, let’s try to not transform every discussion into a Business discussion.
  • We wanted to have the categories based on Movies/Shows creation process…
    – Rumored has been changed to Anticipated for clarity.
    – The Released tab is split between: preview (things we are beta testing, out but still getting feedback before we roll-out), now in theaters (fresh roll-out, think last couple of months), now streaming (has been released some months ago and should now be known by everybody).
  • The Public Roadmap doesn’t have dates and will probably never have. It is different from our internal planning. If you want a feature faster than an other, you can vote and set the importance to the highest.
  • We have looked at other tools, this one fits our current product mindset. The portal is not as open or as polished as UserVoice,… but it’s only one aspect of the whole tool. Prioritization will get better with this one.
  • If you want to give public feedback and ā€œbrainstormā€ with the community on a feature, you can still share it on the forum and discuss. But keep in mind that the whole conversation may not appear in our product backlog. I’m working on it but we’ll probably just have new ideas and votes count, not comments. Also, it won’t be a 2 way sync.
  • What people find important or not and why is used internally only (to compute a user score that will be a part of a bigger ā€œfeature scoreā€), it isn’t shared. From previous experiences, I can say that, usually, this makes feedback easier for some users.
  • When we start working on or if we release something you voted for, you will be notified.
  • We are working on integrating the public roadmap and board into the website (both Trakt and Lite) to encourage more people to share feedback. This will also make using your Trakt account (via SSO) possible to reduce that email sharing friction.

Keep voting :ballot_box_with_ballot::blush:

4 Likes

So we can’t get a ā€œ200: important, 15 criticical, 5 unimportantā€ sort of thing? It would just give a guide as to whether or not a feature we like would get higher in priority than some others, does that make sense?

5 Likes

I’ll look into it. With more votes & feedback, we’ll probably be able to split the anticipated tab in sections like ā€œnextā€, ā€œlaterā€ and ā€œnice to haveā€.

1 Like

ā€œnot lostā€ … ā€œmigrate relevant ideasā€

this is like the 4th or 5th place for feature requests we had now it’s easily the worst and most closed off one (100% moderated and only private feedback).
it can suffice alright for you guys to share a roadmap but I don’t see this usable for user suggestions at all.

11 Likes

i prefer the private feedback. I don’t need people commenting on my ideas or feedback, that’s what the forums are for. I can leave a more honest review of the roadmap features without worrying what some other user thinks about my opinions.

6 Likes

Uh, why would the ability or inability of others to comment on stuff affect your ability to leave honest reviews? Moreover, why do you care what others think?

6 Likes

i dont care what others think, but i dont need people commenting on my ideas like you just did. if im giving feedback about a feature i dont need it to be public. the point of the feedback section is not to devolve into banter that gets off topic like so often happens in forums

3 Likes

But you just said that it’d prevent you from writing honest reviews and you’d be worrying what other users think, ergo you would care. You’re contradicting yourself.

But oh well, I was just curious. You seem quite sensitive so I’ll leave you to your own devices.

1 Like

I’m not bothered about what they say but, like a poll, I’d love to see whether people like a feature or don’t. The more likes I guess might make more people try out that feature, which in turn would help people decide whether to stay VIP or not (I’d assume quite a few new features would be VIP only)

2 Likes

its not that i’m sensitive, and that’s not a bad thing in and of itself. think about reviews you’ve ready or heard about a movie or book only to be let down because the reviewers tastes are different than yours. it changes your expectations or gives you biases or opinions that may not have been there had you not seen someone else’s thoughts. private feedback helps prevent other’s opinions from influencing incoming feedback; it helps prevent an echo chamber. if trakt staff wanted that, they’d leave the feedback to the forums and reddit.

2 Likes

Then just send an email.

2 Likes

Looking good Kevin, can you add Tiered pricing to Anticipated? I would be interested in seeing user feedback on it

2 Likes

Sorry about that!

It is the most transparent in terms of where we are going tho.
If you want something to be discussed publicly, you can still use the forum but maybe also vote for it on our public board. I don’t mind the duplicates but I fear missing some feedback (because I wouldn’t see it for any reason).

Noted and I agree with you, this one is better at showing the public roadmap than at public discussion.

You have the count of people who voted for something in the new board and I will do my best to translate the criticality (or timeframe) in a way. Before, you had ā€œvote countsā€ on the Forum without a real indication of what would come next or what users really felt critical (except comments but it’s not always a good indicator).
If you want, you can still open a forum post with a Feature Request you are not sure about and even ask if you or others would prefer that on the free plan or VIP. Then, when you have more feedback, you can send it to the public board… I’ll probably do it anyway when I see it (I prefer to handle duplicates than to miss something).

Always possible, yes. Votes and board idea is more direct tho.


As a Product Manager, I would prefer an all in one tool that would be the best at forum, feedback categorization, feature prioritization and roadmapping (public and private). I didn’t find it (yet). In the meantime, we are trying to consolidate things with that tool and I’m looking at integrations between Discourse (the forum) and Productboard (insights, feature and roadmap) to have the best of both world.

2 Likes

Translating it into something useful for us users is a good idea. The count at the moment could be good, bad or other, so doesn’t tell us much lol

1 Like

The votes/feedback don’t even tell me if they’re for or against the idea… it’s extremely cryptic. And if that is where are you going to voting probably has barely and impact regardless.

I rather not send suggestions into a void that a) have been rejected previously or b) have already been done by someone else but not yet public…

6 Likes

new roadmap
look inside
Al slop

6 Likes

Most of the films I watch are CGI, the code I write linked heavily with AI now. I think the concern that needs to be addressed is the lack of compassion for the subscribers that feel morally violated by a hefty increase.

5 Likes

I get that. I have cancelled too after 4 years. I just found it funny.

I do not mind AI for personal use but I strongly dislike it being used by companies to save money on an actual artist.

Not to mention that this pic serves no purpose.

8 Likes