Geeeez, it’s amazing how entitled people feel for features on a free service.
As Justin has pointed out, Trakt is a small company so these changes are obviously to help support that (I’m guessing mainly in the server-load department).
It seems like everyone seems to think lists didn’t have limits up until now so let’s compare:
5 personal lists - down to 2
500 personal list items - down to 100 (it was only 250 pre-2022 and your existing lists stay)
1000 watchlist items - down to 100 (again, it was only 250 pre-2022 and your existing watchlist stays)
Sure, the watchlist items are a big drop, but as Justin points out, that’s 5.8% of users. The fact of the matter is, if you’re Tracking tons of stuff, you are not only in a minority, but you’re a ‘pro user’. It’s totally fair to expect pro users to pay for services that cost money to run.
And that’s the thing. I’ve seen many people say along the lines of ‘if Trakt is a healthy company, with no revenue problem, why do this?’
Well, that’s what you do as a business, you anticipate things. You don’t wait until you have a problem before making changes and trying to get quick money. Justin and the team are obviously planning for future growth. They’re certainly seeing more and more users come to this platform, especially through third party apps like Sequel.
Finally, Trakt doesn’t sell your data. Frankly, if you wanted more features for free, maybe they’d have to. Do you really want that?
No one likes having to pay for more things, especially subscriptions. But the fact is, if this service is providing you with great quality features that you use on a daily basis, why not pay for it? I understand it’s disappointing to have lower limits on lists but if that 5.8% of users with more than 100 items in their watch list goes up to 10%, that costs Trakt a lot more money that they aren’t getting at all from those extra 4.2%.
I appreciate Justin being honest and upfront about these changes, plus he seems to be listening and responding to complaints. I wish all tech companies were like this.