Correct, seeing as i host two servers i am familiar with docker, I just don’t want my gaming rig running unnecessary applications. Plus, my Raspberry Pi is somewhere in one of many boxes and the thought of looking for it fills me with dreed, lolz.
1 Like
Looks quite promising - too bad it’s docker related.
Why do you consider that bad?
Because I’m a FreeBSD user - it’s almost impossible to docker-compose something on a BSD system 
1 Like
Add one more to the cancel list.
3 Likes
I was already working in IT before FreeBSD was born, but I don’t know why this seems to be amusing to you. I know several younger people using it, since it’s a stable and reliable system that doesn’t have the need for 42000 derivates like “Linux”.
I also use OpenBSD.
3 Likes
And heres what you could have had…
Not necessarily all about the money. The way that a buisness acts, replies, and performs when a complaint is made is a huge measure of the way they want you as a customer.
Now a fully signed up member to SIMKL for life, and I will donate monthly to ensure that this site keeps getting stronger and stonger, as long as their greed doesn’t get larger and larger like some other site I know…
So instead of doubling, you’ve lost. I know not everyone will feel the same, hell you may even make money from other followers, and I wish you luck, but I do hope you look after your colleagues better than you looked after your customers.
10 Likes
Add one more to the cancel list.
6 Likes
What about $30 a year for 3 years for those who were grandfathered in, that way a 50% increase for them won’t feel so much like a gut bunch that 100% is?
I was a VIP for 4 years now.
Did not used the most of the new features but liked the idea of supporting Trakt to keep it up and running.
But doubling the price is ridicolous.
I canceled as well and will stay VIP until end of July.
4 Likes
Tiered pricing is all it would take to keep most of us happy to keep supporting Trakt.
I don’t know why they fail to understand that 
4 Likes
Trakt does not care. We helped them get to where they are and they just pushed us to the side. I too subscribed to help keep Trakt alive in a small way.
They say that they are financially stable. You do not take the staps that they have taken unless you need to raise money or make yourself more attractive to an investor.
“We don’t need money, we are just doubling/quadrupling prices because we want to.”
8 Likes
I will not be renewing my subscription.
Trakt has forgotten it’s place with consumers.
This is a price gouge no matter how you slice it. Almost zero industries can actually justify a 100% increase of a price.
When you look at a business like Trakt, it’s going to have the cost of actually developing the software that people use and the cost of maintaining the servers: making sure that there are enough servers to handle requests as well as making sure that the storage is there for people to store their information. That being said a company like Trakt isn’t doing even 1% of the bandwidth that Netflix or Hulu is doing.
I believe I can confidently say that 90%+ of their VIP subscribers are using it for the automatic Plex scrobbling.
To me it’s really gross just because it makes me think that Trakt thinks that they are almost as valuable as Netflix or other streaming platforms. Because they aren’t. They don’t stream content. For $2 more per month I could get Netflix standard with ads. I remember when Plex was selling Plex pass on a promo for $70 for a lifetime subscription.
There’s absolutely zero chance of me paying $60 per year for what is basically a glorified content management system.
Trakt has completely alienated its core subscriber base.
But overall I just don’t think that it’s important enough to people to pay $60 a year to track how often they watch a TV show.
Especially when there are self hosted options for this.
I’m probably just not going to track my TV watching anymore.
This is all really disappointing.
15 Likes
That’s not a realistic comparison. You don’t know the number of servers that Trakt has available compared to another service like Netflix or Hulu, and they mentioned having to double the number of servers for redundancy so you don’t lose your data like the server crash they had in December 2022. Netflix and Hulu would have at least double or triple the number of servers to keep from losing content. And subbing to Netflix while still being subject to ads is just subsidizing the cost Netflix has to pay for the servers, essentially you’re just paying to see commercials. So doubling the infrastructure cost is causing Trakt to increase their price.
Regardless, the value of anything is subjective. If you don’t believe it to be valuable anymore, that’s your valid opinion. I find $60/year more than reasonable and have been paying such for over 2 years. You can be mad at the price increase, but you can’t tell someone that something isn’t valuable.
3 Likes
Well, they definitely have a smaller infrastructure than any streaming service simply because they don’t stream anything and also they do not store terabytes of content. Also (but I may be mistaken here), they are simply using user-created content (from third parties or by users on the Trakt platform). So $60/year is pricier than some streaming services, and this is strange for a platform which basically serves as an aggregator of data, not something that creates content.
But all in all, the price increase isn’t the issue here. It’s the way it was communicated and how the long-term VIPs, who were paying simply because they believe in Trakt, were treated. Nothing more, nothing less.
18 Likes
If they have the number of servers that Netflix does (although I’d hope they’ve adopted a serverless architecture at this point), that would be indicative of extremely poor engineering. Trakt does not require that sort of infrastructure to operate. Even with redundancies.
The data loss issue wouldn’t be solved by “more servers.” It would be remedied by a more robust database backup solution—something they apparently didn’t have in place at that time.
Servers also do not equate to bandwidth. Streaming terabytes of video is not comparable to the small, primarily text-based payloads for Trakt requests. Not in the slightest.
I think Trakt, amongst their many other faults in the last few weeks, did a really poor job of justifying the price increase. It does not make sense given what their service actually does. It feels very much like every startup I’ve worked with after aggressive investors get involved. They expect additional profit. They best way to attain that without actually providing any additional, meaningful benefit is to boost subscription prices with some handy-wavy mumbo jumbo about server costs, etc.
These prices are going up industry-wide, that’s true. But not by that much. And not for a service like this. I’d happily be proved wrong, but I don’t expect that level of transparency from Trakt anymore.
21 Likes
Not only are they using only a tiny fraction of the bandwidth of these streaming services, they do not even pay for any of their content. It’s all just grabbed from TMDB and what us users supply. There is literally no way on God’s green Earth that trakt VIP is worth the same as a streaming service. That other user is delusional.
14 Likes
I have cancelled mine too wow what a joke too been a member for 7 years too
8 Likes
It’s the age of parasites, everyone tries to jump in between some chain and proclaim they are indispensable, to such a degree that they fool themselves too.
Sad that to see it happen to my trakt.
7 Likes
Wut streaming service is worth 60 bucks?