šŸ“¢ Updating Trakt Limits for 2026

We’re updating Free and VIP limits to make them clearer, more consistent, and aligned with our upcoming Fair Use Policy.

The goal is simple: define reasonable limits that protect performance and ensure Trakt remains fast and reliable for the majority of users.

All new limits have been determined using real-world usage data. For most users, there will be little to no practical impact.


:bullseye: What This Means for You

Free users

  • Bigger Watchlist (250 instead of 100)
  • Bigger Personal Lists (250 instead of 100)
  • Clear, transparent limits
  • No surprise: you’ll see your usage in advance

VIP users

  • High limits designed for serious tracking
  • Structured, predictable usage rules
  • Clear visibility into how close you are to thresholds

For everyone

  • A simpler, more consistent system
  • Better long-term performance and reliability
  • Limits designed using real usage data, not guesswork

:face_with_monocle: Why We’re Defining New Limits

  1. Transparency
    Clear numbers are easier to understand and plan around.
  2. Consistency
    Limits are now structured the same way across Watchlist, Lists, Library, Notes, and History.
  3. Fair usage at scale
    The Fair Use Policy protects normal personal use while preventing edge-case behavior that can degrade performance.

:rocket: Immediate Changes

These changes are already live. Other updates will roll out progressively over the next few months.

Free users now get:

  • 250 Watchlist Items (previously 100)
  • 250 List Items per Personal List (previously 100)

:soon_arrow: New 2026 Structure

Feature Free VIP
Watched History 100K 100K
Ratings 10K 20K
Watchlist Items 250 5K
List Items (per list) 250 5K
Total List Items (across personal lists) 1K 100K
Personal Lists 5 100
Dynamic Lists (filters) 5 100
Physical Library 100 10K
Digital Library 1K 100K
Total Notes 100 2K

Items mean Movies + TV Shows + Seasons + Episodes depending on what you add to a Personal List/Library.

:one: Personal vs Dynamic Lists

We are clearly separating:

  • Personal Lists → manually curated
  • Dynamic Lists → powered by saved filters

Each category has its own defined limit.

:two: Per-List Items vs Global Listed Items

Personal lists include:

  • A per-list limit
  • A total limit across all personal lists

This ensures fair usage while still allowing meaningful scale for power users.

:three: Digital vs Physical Library

We are formalizing the distinction between:

  • Digital Library
  • Physical Library

Each will have its own limit to support cleaner filtering and long-term scalability.

More on that here.


:eyes: Visibility Before Enforcement

Before enforcement, you’ll see:

  • Your current usage
  • Your plan limits
  • Progress indicators
  • Advance warnings

There will be a transition period. Nothing will silently break.

Free users will see:

VIP users will see:


We’ll share enforcement timing soon, with a clear transition window.

As always, thoughtful feedback is welcome.

So getting an extra list slot on you trakt anniversary is no longer a thing? :thinking:

So because I don’t use your Plex Sync and use the API (via PlexTraktSync), they get flagged as Offline Library and are severely limited?

Yeah - no thanks. That’s utterly garbage

5 Likes

Didn’t even catch that. That is insane.

I mean lol. Im only at like 13k watches after 13 years of trakt but I imagine a hardcore watcher with lots more time would be above that.
It’s a good thing I don’t rate every episodes but only shows and sometimes seasons.

3 Likes

Correct. On the other hand, you’ll get more Lists for free even if you are a new Free user.

Note: this is in the coming soon section, not enforced/implemented yet.

This is not enforced yet. We are still looking at the best way to handle this. Currently only Plex Sync support the Digital Library but we want other tools like PlexTraktSync to be able to do the same.

Not enforced yet. This is one of the limits we’d be willing to increase. For users that rate at episode level, this makes sense. Thanks for your feedback!

2 Likes

This is exactly why that limit has been lowered.
This is one of the limits that could be increased, based on the feedback we get.

I understand that it’s not currently enforced yet - but I have zero confidence and even less faith anything will change in a meaningful manner - and I’ll just effectively be told to get stuffed.

It is what it is, I’m bowing out before I turn into one of the karen’s you see in other threads.

11 Likes

Thank you, this is exactly what we are looking for. Already discussing the ratings limit with the team.

1 Like

When we said ā€œunlimitedā€ in the past, the intent was that normal users shouldn’t have to think about limits. And for the vast majority, that’s still true with 100k. Technically and practically, there’s always been a limit (the hardware and database system, but also, there’s no such thing as unlimited media and unlimited time to watch it).

You’re also right about architecture. V2 slows down (and even sometimes broke with very large dataset) over time because of how it was built. V3 is structured differently under the hood to scale better and, yes, avoid reloading massive amounts of data.

No limit is not possible. I agree with you on Ratings limit being too low given the importance of it to Trakt.

1 Like

It’s great that a bunch of limits are being increased for free users but it seems like the only ones who are negatively impacted by these changes are the paying users.

I wouldn’t even consider my physical media collection a large one but somehow I am over that offline library limit (1.5k/1k) despite my library saying 582 items.

10 Likes

That difference in count is probably because V2 is counting episodes (because you added shows?) and V3 is counting shows :thinking:

Thanks for the info with great detail.

The thing is you’re saying these changes haven’t been implemented but I’m already receiving a message saying I can’t add more items to some of my lists over the new 5,000 items limit.

Paying customers signed up for higher limits than the ones announced here. So now I’m paying for a downgraded service without even sending us some kind of notice ahead so I could agree and keep my subscription or disagree and cancel it.

Feels like fraud to me.

You say you care about your customers but the lack of communication before making changes proves otherwise. This is something you should have communicated to your paying customers way before we’re seeing these limits being implemented.

Imagine Netflix implementing streaming limits overnight without sending a notice to its subscribers. Then the next day users get messages like ā€œyou’ve reached your monthly streaming limitā€. Only to find out that all that Netflix is saying is ā€œwe haven’t implemented these changes (even when users are noticing otherwise) and these changes are necessary to provide a better service (even when the service with higher limits was working just fine). Oh by the way, your bill it’s on its way (even though this is not what you signed up for)ā€.

I’m sorry but as a paying subscriber the only reason I’ve been paying was the 10,000 watchlist limit and the 10,000 items per list limit. I hope my feedback along with others users help you retract at least on these 2 limits that I really care for. Otherwise I’m done with Trakt, with these limits it’s useless for me.

If you wonder how on earth a user would require these higher limits, guess what? You’ve got users that have been building their watching history throughout a decade, being loyal and trusting Trakt. I’m sad you’re clearly not acknowledging that.

Between these new limits and the lack of previous features unavailable on the new version you’re definitely disappointing and losing loyal users.

Enough is enough. I’ll be looking for alternatives. Any recommendations from users reading this? Any other users agree with me or feeling disappointed just as me?

I’ll give it a few days to see if there’s a turnaround, otherwise I’m canceling my subscription for good.

10 Likes

That’s something we are fixing now. Yes, it’s a wording we shouldn’t have used.

This is something we already did, before announcing those new limits. The number of impacted users for watch history is very low. Ratings, Lists and Library have all their other issues → I just want to make it clear that a media aficionado using their entire day to watch things shouldn’t be impacted in their history tracking.

That would be the other way round right? V3 seem to be counting each episode whereas V2 is the one that’s showing less.

From what I’m understanding, if the only thing I ever own physically is One Piece then I already hit that limit because there’s over 1k episodes?

Also why does the digital library get a limit of 100k but a physical library only 1k? That’s such a drastic difference for what’s essentially the same thing

2 Likes

You’re welcome!

Some limits have already been implemented and are documented in the ā€œ:rocket: Immediate Changesā€

This message has been posted after the change got merged and some sanity test passed after our caches were updated. I’m sorry you saw it before the announcement but it’s difficult to do this at the exact same time.

Your watch history is limited to 100k items. Pease avoid adding your watch history to a Personal List, this is not the purpose of Personal Lists.

Look on the internet for Trakt alternatives. We are against advertising for competition on the Trakt Forums.

This is possible. We are going to align those things. It is currently confusing.

For the Physical Library, we shouldn’t count at episode level. Because you either own whole seasons or whole series. You can’t physically buy an episode (right?).

The above is already a big difference. You can ā€œhaveā€ a digital episode. You can’t own a physical episode. We shouldn’t count individual episodes (or even let you) add individual episodes to your physical library.
(Let me know if it makes sense to you :eyes:)

Then there is a major bug because I certainly do not own 1.5k physical items but the limit is saying otherwise.

Please consider making the limit for physical media the same as digital media. It makes zero sense to put this restriction on physical media owners.

Especially as it doesn’t even put extra strain on Trakt’s servers. If I were to log those as digital, then you wouldn’t even know about it.

8 Likes